%================================================================
% LaTeX file with prefered layout for H1 paper drafts
% use: dvips -D600 file-name
%================================================================
%%%%%%%%%%%%% LATEX HEADER
%%%%%%%%%%%%% DO NOT DELET NOT CHANGE ANYTHING IN THE HEADER
%%%%%%%%%%%%% UNLESS CLEARLY RECOMMENDED
\documentclass[12pt]{article}
\usepackage{epsfig}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{hhline}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{times}
\usepackage{cite}
%%%%%%%%%%%% Comment the next two lines to remove the line numbering
\usepackage[]{lineno}
%\linenumbers
%%%%%%%%%%%%
\renewcommand{\topfraction}{1.0}
\renewcommand{\bottomfraction}{1.0}
\renewcommand{\textfraction}{0.0}
\newlength{\dinwidth}
\newlength{\dinmargin}
\setlength{\dinwidth}{21.0cm}
\textheight23.5cm \textwidth16.0cm
\setlength{\dinmargin}{\dinwidth}
\setlength{\unitlength}{1mm}
\addtolength{\dinmargin}{-\textwidth}
\setlength{\dinmargin}{0.5\dinmargin}
\oddsidemargin -1.0in
\addtolength{\oddsidemargin}{\dinmargin}
\setlength{\evensidemargin}{\oddsidemargin}
\setlength{\marginparwidth}{0.9\dinmargin}
\marginparsep 8pt \marginparpush 5pt
\topmargin -42pt
\headheight 12pt
\headsep 30pt \footskip 24pt
\parskip 3mm plus 2mm minus 2mm
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% END OF LATEX HEADER
%===============================title page=============================
\begin{document}  
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Pre-defined commands, you can use for the most obvious notations
\newcommand{\pom}{{I\!\!P}}
\newcommand{\reg}{{I\!\!R}}
\newcommand{\slowpi}{\pi_{\mathit{slow}}}
%\newcommand{\gevsq}{\mathrm{GeV}^2}
\newcommand{\fiidiii}{F_2^{D(3)}}
\newcommand{\fiidiiiarg}{\fiidiii\,(\beta,\,Q^2,\,x)}
\newcommand{\n}{1.19\pm 0.06 (stat.) \pm0.07 (syst.)}
\newcommand{\nz}{1.30\pm 0.08 (stat.)^{+0.08}_{-0.14} (syst.)}
\newcommand{\fiidiiiful}{F_2^{D(4)}\,(\beta,\,Q^2,\,x,\,t)}
\newcommand{\fiipom}{\tilde F_2^D}
\newcommand{\ALPHA}{1.10\pm0.03 (stat.) \pm0.04 (syst.)}
\newcommand{\ALPHAZ}{1.15\pm0.04 (stat.)^{+0.04}_{-0.07} (syst.)}
\newcommand{\fiipomarg}{\fiipom\,(\beta,\,Q^2)}
\newcommand{\pomflux}{f_{\pom / p}}
\newcommand{\nxpom}{1.19\pm 0.06 (stat.) \pm0.07 (syst.)}
\newcommand {\gapprox}
   {\raisebox{-0.7ex}{$\stackrel {\textstyle>}{\sim}$}}
\newcommand {\lapprox}
   {\raisebox{-0.7ex}{$\stackrel {\textstyle<}{\sim}$}}
\def\gsim{\,\lower.25ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle\sim$}\kern-1.30ex%
\raise 0.55ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle >$}\,}
\def\lsim{\,\lower.25ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle\sim$}\kern-1.30ex%
\raise 0.55ex\hbox{$\scriptstyle <$}\,}
\newcommand{\pomfluxarg}{f_{\pom / p}\,(x_\pom)}
\newcommand{\dsf}{\mbox{$F_2^{D(3)}$}}
\newcommand{\dsfva}{\mbox{$F_2^{D(3)}(\beta,Q^2,x_{I\!\!P})$}}
\newcommand{\dsfvb}{\mbox{$F_2^{D(3)}(\beta,Q^2,x)$}}
\newcommand{\dsfpom}{$F_2^{I\!\!P}$}
\newcommand{\gap}{\stackrel{>}{\sim}}
\newcommand{\lap}{\stackrel{<}{\sim}}
\newcommand{\fem}{$F_2^{em}$}
\newcommand{\tsnmp}{$\tilde{\sigma}_{NC}(e^{\mp})$}
\newcommand{\tsnm}{$\tilde{\sigma}_{NC}(e^-)$}
\newcommand{\tsnp}{$\tilde{\sigma}_{NC}(e^+)$}
\newcommand{\st}{$\star$}
\newcommand{\sst}{$\star \star$}
\newcommand{\ssst}{$\star \star \star$}
\newcommand{\sssst}{$\star \star \star \star$}
\newcommand{\tw}{\theta_W}
\newcommand{\sw}{\sin{\theta_W}}
\newcommand{\cw}{\cos{\theta_W}}
\newcommand{\sww}{\sin^2{\theta_W}}
\newcommand{\cww}{\cos^2{\theta_W}}
\newcommand{\trm}{m_{\perp}}
\newcommand{\trp}{p_{\perp}}
\newcommand{\trmm}{m_{\perp}^2}
\newcommand{\trpp}{p_{\perp}^2}
\newcommand{\alp}{\alpha_s}

\newcommand{\alps}{\alpha_s}
\newcommand{\sqrts}{$\sqrt{s}$}
\newcommand{\LO}{$O(\alpha_s^0)$}
\newcommand{\Oa}{$O(\alpha_s)$}
\newcommand{\Oaa}{$O(\alpha_s^2)$}
\newcommand{\PT}{p_{\perp}}
\newcommand{\JPSI}{J/\psi}
\newcommand{\sh}{\hat{s}}
%\newcommand{\th}{\hat{t}}
\newcommand{\uh}{\hat{u}}
\newcommand{\MP}{m_{J/\psi}}
%\newcommand{\PO}{\mbox{l}\!\mbox{P}}
\newcommand{\PO}{I\!\!P}
\newcommand{\xbj}{x}
\newcommand{\xpom}{x_{\PO}}
\newcommand{\ttbs}{\char'134}
\newcommand{\xpomlo}{3\times10^{-4}}  
\newcommand{\xpomup}{0.05}  
\newcommand{\dgr}{^\circ}
\newcommand{\pbarnt}{\,\mbox{{\rm pb$^{-1}$}}}
\newcommand{\gev}{\,\mbox{GeV}}
\newcommand{\WBoson}{\mbox{$W$}}
\newcommand{\fbarn}{\,\mbox{{\rm fb}}}
\newcommand{\fbarnt}{\,\mbox{{\rm fb$^{-1}$}}}
\newcommand{\dsdx}[1]{$d\sigma\!/\!d #1\,$}
\newcommand{\eV}{\mbox{e\hspace{-0.08em}V}}
%
% Some useful tex commands
%
\newcommand{\qsq}{\ensuremath{Q^2} }
\newcommand{\gevsq}{\ensuremath{\mathrm{GeV}^2} }
\newcommand{\et}{\ensuremath{E_t^*} }
\newcommand{\rap}{\ensuremath{\eta^*} }
\newcommand{\gp}{\ensuremath{\gamma^*}p }
\newcommand{\dsiget}{\ensuremath{{\rm d}\sigma_{ep}/{\rm d}E_t^*} }
\newcommand{\dsigrap}{\ensuremath{{\rm d}\sigma_{ep}/{\rm d}\eta^*} }

%%% Dstar stuff
\newcommand{\dstar}{\ensuremath{D^*}}
\newcommand{\dstarp}{\ensuremath{D^{*+}}}
\newcommand{\dstarm}{\ensuremath{D^{*-}}}
\newcommand{\dstarpm}{\ensuremath{D^{*\pm}}}
\newcommand{\zDs}{\ensuremath{z(\dstar )}}
\newcommand{\Wgp}{\ensuremath{W_{\gamma p}}}
\newcommand{\ptds}{\ensuremath{p_t(\dstar )}}
\newcommand{\etads}{\ensuremath{\eta(\dstar )}}
\newcommand{\ptj}{\ensuremath{p_t(\mbox{jet})}}
\newcommand{\ptjn}[1]{\ensuremath{p_t(\mbox{jet$_{#1}$})}}
\newcommand{\etaj}{\ensuremath{\eta(\mbox{jet})}}
\newcommand{\detadsj}{\ensuremath{\eta(\dstar )\, \mbox{-}\, \etaj}}

% Journal macro
\def\Journal#1#2#3#4{{#1} {\bf #2} (#3) #4}
\def\NCA{\em Nuovo Cimento}
\def\NIM{\em Nucl. Instrum. Methods}
\def\NIMA{{\em Nucl. Instrum. Methods} {\bf A}}
\def\NPB{{\em Nucl. Phys.}   {\bf B}}
\def\PLB{{\em Phys. Lett.}   {\bf B}}
\def\PRL{\em Phys. Rev. Lett.}
\def\PRD{{\em Phys. Rev.}    {\bf D}}
\def\ZPC{{\em Z. Phys.}      {\bf C}}
\def\EJC{{\em Eur. Phys. J.} {\bf C}}
\def\CPC{\em Comp. Phys. Commun.}

\begin{titlepage}

\noindent
%\begin{flushleft}
%{\tt DESY YY-NNN    \hfill    ISSN 0418-9833} \\
%{\tt Month YYYY}                  \\
%\end{flushleft}



\noindent
%Date:          [today  instruction is preferred] \\ %\today      \\
%Version:       Preparatives 0.1,0.2...; 1st draft: 1.0, 1.1...; 2nd Draft 2.0..., Final Reading 3.0,3.1...      \\
%Editors:            \\
%Referees:           \\
%Comments by         \\
\noindent
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%% For conference papers  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%% coment the header and fill the right conference
%%%%% {\it {\large version of \today}} \\[.3em]
\begin{center} %%% you may want to use this line for working versions
 \begin{small}
 \begin{tabular}{llrr}
 {\bf H1prelim-09-044} Submitted to & & &
 \epsfig{file=H1logo_bw_small.epsi
 ,width=1.5cm} \\[.2em] \hline
 \multicolumn{4}{l}{{\bf
                  XVII International Workshop on Deep Inelastic Scattering, 
		  DIS2009},
                  April 26-30,~2009,~Madrid} \\
%                  Abstract:        & {\bf xx-xxx}    & & \\
                  Parallel Session & {\bf Structure functions}   & & \\ \hline
   \multicolumn{4}{l}{\footnotesize {\it Electronic Access:
  www-h1.desy.de/publications/H1preliminary.short\_list.html}} \\[.2em]
 \end{tabular}
 \end{small}
 \end{center}


\vspace{2cm}
\begin{center}
\begin{Large}

{\bf Measurement of the Longitudinal Structure Function $F_L$ of the Proton at Low $x$ in an extended Q2 range \\(version of \today )}

\vspace{2cm}

H1 Collaboration

\end{Large}
\end{center}

\vspace{2cm}

\begin{abstract}
 A measurement is presented of the longitudinal proton structure function $F_{L}(x,Q^{2})$ derived from inclusive deep inelastic $ep$ scattering cross section measurements with the H1 detector at HERA. The data were taken in the year 2007 at a positron beam energy of $E_{e}=27.5$\,GeV and proton beam energies $E_{p}$ of 920\,GeV, 575\,GeV and 460\,GeV. The measurements of $F_L$ use different parts of the H1 detector covering when combined a range of four-momentum transfers squared $2.5 \leq Q^2 \leq 800~$GeV$^2$ and Bjorken $x$ between 0.00005 and 0.035. The data are compared with higher order QCD predictions.
\end{abstract}

\vspace{1.5cm}

%\begin{center}
%To be submitted to \EJC \;\; or \PLB
%\end{center}

\end{titlepage}

%          THE PAPER DRAFTS HAVE NO AUTHORLIST
%
%          FOR PAPER ISSUED FOR THE FINAL READING 
%          COPY THE AUTHOR AND INSTITUTE LISTS 
%          INTO YOUR AREA
%
% from /h1/iww/ipublications/h1auts.tex 
%          AND UNCOMMENT THE NEXT THREE LINES 
%
%\begin{flushleft}
%  \input{h1auts}
%\end{flushleft}
%
% Please not that the author list may need re-formatting.

\newpage
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%\begin{figure}[hhh]
%\center
%\epsfig{file=fig_template/cex.eps,width=\textwidth}
%\setlength{\unitlength}{1cm}
% \begin{picture}(15.0,10.0)
% \put(0.,0.0)
% {\epsfig{file=/h1/psfiles/figures/d98-029f6.eps,width=11.0cm}}
% \end{picture}
%\caption{ A commented example of figure that  already looks nice but has clear defficiencies.}
%\label{fig:cex} 
%\end{figure}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%1
\begin{figure}[hhh]
\center
\epsfig{file=fig_template/H1prelim-09-044.fig01.eps,width=10cm}
\setlength{\unitlength}{1cm}
% \begin{picture}(15.0,10.0)
% \put(0.,0.0)
% {\epsfig{file=/h1/psfiles/figures/d98-029f6.eps,width=8.0cm}}
% \end{picture}
\caption{The comparison of the positive charge data (points) with the sum of background determined from the negative charge data (green histogram) and the DIS MC (magenta band) for the low proton beam energy ($460$~GeV) in the full electron energy range from $3.4$~GeV to $32$~GeV. The band includes statistical error on MC and background as well as correlated systematic uncertainty. The distributions from left to right and from up to down are the scattered electron energy $\rm E_{e}^{'}$, the scattered electron polar angle $\Theta_{e}$, the sum $\rm E-P_{z}$ of all final state particles, the $z$-position of the event vertex $\rm Z_{vtx}$, the radial coordinate of the cluster position in SpaCal $R_{SpaCal}$ and the $\rm P_{t}$ balance ${P^{h}_{t}}/{P^{e}_{t}}$.}
\label{fig:1} 
\end{figure}

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%2
\begin{figure}[hhh]
\center
\epsfig{file=fig_template/H1prelim-09-044.fig02.eps,width=10cm}
\setlength{\unitlength}{1cm}
% \begin{picture}(15.0,10.0)
% \put(0.,0.0)
% {\epsfig{file=/h1/psfiles/figures/d98-029f6.eps,width=8.0cm}}
% \end{picture}
\caption{The comparison of the positive charge data (points) with the sum of background determined from the negative charge data (green histogram) and the DIS MC (magenta band) for the medium proton beam energy ($575$~GeV) in the full electron energy range from $3.4$~GeV to $32$~GeV. The band includes statistical error on MC and background as well as correlated systematic uncertainty. The distributions from left to right and from up to down are the scattered electron energy $\rm E_{e}^{'}$, the scattered electron polar angle $\Theta_{e}$, the sum $\rm E-P_{z}$ of all final state particles, the $z$-position of the event vertex $\rm Z_{vtx}$, the radial coordinate of the cluster position in SpaCal $R_{SpaCal}$ and the $\rm P_{t}$ balance ${P^{h}_{t}}/{P^{e}_{t}}$.}
\label{fig:2} 
\end{figure}

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%3
\begin{figure}[hhh]
\center
\epsfig{file=fig_template/H1prelim-09-044.fig03.eps,width=10cm}
\setlength{\unitlength}{1cm}
% \begin{picture}(15.0,10.0)
% \put(0.,0.0)
% {\epsfig{file=/h1/psfiles/figures/d98-029f6.eps,width=8.0cm}}
% \end{picture}
\caption{The comparison of the positive charge data (points) with the sum of background determined from the negative charge data (green histogram) and the DIS MC (magenta band) for the low proton beam energy ($460$~GeV) with the scattered electron energy less than $10$~GeV. The band includes statistical error on MC and background as well as correlated systematic uncertainty. The distributions from left to right and from up to down are the scattered electron energy $\rm E_{e}^{'}$, the scattered electron polar angle $\Theta_{e}$, the $z$-position of the event vertex $\rm Z_{vtx}$ and the sum $\rm E-P_{z}$ of all final state particles. The cut values on the last two variables, which are applied in the analysis, are indicated by vertical lines. For $\rm Z_{vtx}$ that is range of $35$~cm and for $\rm E-P_{z}$ cut is on $35$~GeV.}
\label{fig:3} 
\end{figure}

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%4
\begin{figure}[hhh]
\center
\epsfig{file=fig_template/H1prelim-09-044.fig04.eps,width=10cm}
\setlength{\unitlength}{1cm}
% \begin{picture}(15.0,10.0)
% \put(0.,0.0)
% {\epsfig{file=/h1/psfiles/figures/d98-029f6.eps,width=8.0cm}}
% \end{picture}
\caption{The comparison of the positive charge data (points) with the sum of background determined from the negative charge data (green histogram) and the DIS MC (magenta band) for the medium proton beam energy ($575$~GeV) with the scattered electron energy less than $10$~GeV. The band includes statistical error on MC and background as well as correlated systematic uncertainty. The distributions from left to right and from up to down are the scattered electron energy $\rm E_{e}^{'}$, the scattered electron polar angle $\Theta_{e}$, the $z$-position of the event vertex $\rm Z_{vtx}$ and the sum $\rm E-P_{z}$ of all final state particles. The cut values on the last two variables, which are applied in the analysis, are indicated by vertical lines. For $\rm Z_{vtx}$ that is range of $35$~cm and for $\rm E-P_{z}$ cut is on $35$~GeV.}
\label{fig:4} 
\end{figure}

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%5
\begin{figure}[hhh]
\center
\epsfig{file=fig_template/H1prelim-09-044.fig05.eps,width=10cm}
\setlength{\unitlength}{1cm}
% \begin{picture}(15.0,10.0)
% \put(0.,0.0)
% {\epsfig{file=/h1/psfiles/figures/d98-029f6.eps,width=8.0cm}}
% \end{picture}
\caption{The comparison of the signal distributions (background subtracted with corresponding asymmetry factor) for the low proton beam energy ($460$~GeV) with the scattered electron energy less than $10$~GeV. The distributions from left to right and from up to down are the scattered electron energy $\rm E_{e}^{'}$, the scattered electron polar angle $\Theta_{e}$, the $z$-position of the event vertex $\rm Z_{vtx}$ and the sum $\rm E-P_{z}$ of all final state particles. The cut values on the last two variables, which are applied in the analysis, are indicated by vertical lines. For $\rm Z_{vtx}$ that is range of $35$~cm and for $\rm E-P_{z}$ cut is on $35$~GeV.}
\label{fig:5} 
\end{figure}

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%6
\begin{figure}[hhh]
\center
\epsfig{file=fig_template/H1prelim-09-044.fig06.eps,width=10cm}
\setlength{\unitlength}{1cm}
% \begin{picture}(15.0,10.0)
% \put(0.,0.0)
% {\epsfig{file=/h1/psfiles/figures/d98-029f6.eps,width=8.0cm}}
% \end{picture}
\caption{The comparison of the signal distributions (background subtracted with corresponding asymmetry factor) for the medium proton beam energy ($575$~GeV) with the scattered electron energy less than $10$~GeV. The distributions from left to right and from up to down are the scattered electron energy $\rm E_{e}^{'}$, the scattered electron polar angle $\Theta_{e}$, the $z$-position of the event vertex $\rm Z_{vtx}$ and the sum $\rm E-P_{z}$ of all final state particles. The cut values on the last two variables, which are applied in the analysis, are indicated by vertical lines. For $\rm Z_{vtx}$ that is range of $35$~cm and for $\rm E-P_{z}$ cut is on $35$~GeV.}
\label{fig:6} 
\end{figure}

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%7
\begin{figure}[hhh]
\center
\epsfig{file=fig_template/H1prelim-09-044.fig07.eps,width=10cm}
\setlength{\unitlength}{1cm}
% \begin{picture}(15.0,10.0)
% \put(0.,0.0)
% {\epsfig{file=/h1/psfiles/figures/d98-029f6.eps,width=8.0cm}}
% \end{picture}
\caption{The comparison of the positive charge data (points) with the sum of background determined from the negative charge data (green histogram) and the DIS MC (magenta band) for the low proton beam energy ($460$~GeV) with the scattered electron energy less than $10$~GeV. The distributions from left to right are the inelasticity $y$, the four-momentum transfer squared $Q^{2}$ and Bjorken $x$.}
\label{fig:7} 
\end{figure}

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%8
\begin{figure}[hhh]
\center
\epsfig{file=fig_template/H1prelim-09-044.fig08.eps,width=10cm}
\setlength{\unitlength}{1cm}
% \begin{picture}(15.0,10.0)
% \put(0.,0.0)
% {\epsfig{file=/h1/psfiles/figures/d98-029f6.eps,width=8.0cm}}
% \end{picture}
\caption{The comparison of the positive charge data (points) with the sum of background determined from the negative charge data (green histogram) and the DIS MC (magenta band) for the medium proton beam energy ($575$~GeV) with the scattered electron energy less than $10$~GeV. The distributions from left to right are the inelasticity $y$, the four-momentum transfer squared $Q^{2}$ and Bjorken $x$.}
\label{fig:8} 
\end{figure}

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%9
\begin{figure}[hhh]
\center
\epsfig{file=fig_template/H1prelim-09-044.fig09.eps,width=10cm}
\setlength{\unitlength}{1cm}
% \begin{picture}(15.0,10.0)
% \put(0.,0.0)
% {\epsfig{file=/h1/psfiles/figures/d98-029f6.eps,width=8.0cm}}
% \end{picture}
\caption{The comparison of the signal distributions (background subtracted with corresponding asymmetry factor) for the low proton beam energy ($460$~GeV) with the scattered electron energy less than $10$~GeV. The distributions from left to right are the inelasticity $y$, the four-momentum transfer squared $Q^{2}$ and Bjorken $x$.}
\label{fig:9} 
\end{figure}

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%10
\begin{figure}[hhh]
\center
\epsfig{file=fig_template/H1prelim-09-044.fig10.eps,width=10cm}
\setlength{\unitlength}{1cm}
% \begin{picture}(15.0,10.0)
% \put(0.,0.0)
% {\epsfig{file=/h1/psfiles/figures/d98-029f6.eps,width=8.0cm}}
% \end{picture}
\caption{The comparison of the signal distributions (background subtracted with corresponding asymmetry factor) for the medium proton beam energy ($575$~GeV) with the scattered electron energy less than $10$~GeV. The distributions from left to right are the inelasticity $y$, the four-momentum transfer squared $Q^{2}$ and Bjorken $x$.}
\label{fig:10} 
\end{figure}

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%11
\begin{figure}[hhh]
\center
\epsfig{file=fig_template/H1prelim-09-044.fig11.eps,width=10cm}
\setlength{\unitlength}{1cm}
% \begin{picture}(15.0,10.0)
% \put(0.,0.0)
% {\epsfig{file=/h1/psfiles/figures/d98-029f6.eps,width=8.0cm}}
% \end{picture}
\caption{The reduced cross section $\sigma_{r}(x,Q^{2},y)$ measured at different $Q^{2}$ values as a function of $x$ using data taken at the proton beam energies of $920$~GeV (boxes), $575$~GeV (stars) and $460$~GeV (points). The inner error bars are the statistical errors and the full error bars represent the statistical and the systematic errors added in quadrature. Theoretical predictions of $\sigma_{r}$ are shown as the solid blue line for $920$~GeV, the dashed-dotted black line for $575$~GeV and the dashed magenta line for $460$~GeV. The dashed black line represents the QCD expectation of $F_{2}$ derived from the H1PDF 2009 fit.}
\label{fig:11} 
\end{figure}

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%12
\begin{figure}[hhh]
\center
\epsfig{file=fig_template/H1prelim-09-044.fig12.eps,width=10cm}
\setlength{\unitlength}{1cm}
% \begin{picture}(15.0,10.0)
% \put(0.,0.0)
% {\epsfig{file=/h1/psfiles/figures/d98-029f6.eps,width=8.0cm}}
% \end{picture}
\caption{The reduced cross section $\sigma_{r}(x,Q^{2},y)$ measured at $\rm Q^{2}=3.5~GeV^{2}$ as a function of $x$ using data taken at the proton beam energies of $920$~GeV (boxes), $575$~GeV (stars) and $460$~GeV (points). The inner error bars are the statistical errors and the full error bars represent the statistical and the systematic errors added in quadrature. Theoretical predictions of $\sigma_{r}$ are shown as the solid blue line for $920$~GeV, the dashed-dotted black line for $575$~GeV and the dashed magenta line for $460$~GeV. The dashed black line represents the QCD expectation of $F_{2}$ derived from the H1PDF 2009 fit.}
\label{fig:12} 
\end{figure}

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%13
\begin{figure}[hhh]
\center
\epsfig{file=fig_template/H1prelim-09-044.fig13.eps,width=10cm}
\setlength{\unitlength}{1cm}
% \begin{picture}(15.0,10.0)
% \put(0.,0.0)
% {\epsfig{file=/h1/psfiles/figures/d98-029f6.eps,width=8.0cm}}
% \end{picture}
\caption{The reduced cross section $\sigma_{r}(x,Q^{2},y)$ measured at $\rm Q^{2}=5~GeV^{2}$ as a function of $x$ using data taken at the proton beam energies of $920$~GeV (boxes), $575$~GeV (stars) and $460$~GeV (points). The inner error bars are the statistical errors and the full error bars represent the statistical and the systematic errors added in quadrature. Theoretical predictions of $\sigma_{r}$ are shown as the solid blue line for $920$~GeV, the dashed-dotted black line for $575$~GeV and the dashed magenta line for $460$~GeV. The dashed black line represents the QCD expectation of $F_{2}$ derived from the H1PDF 2009 fit.}
\label{fig:13} 
\end{figure}

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%14
\begin{figure}[hhh]
\center
\epsfig{file=fig_template/H1prelim-09-044.fig14.eps,width=10cm}
\setlength{\unitlength}{1cm}
% \begin{picture}(15.0,10.0)
% \put(0.,0.0)
% {\epsfig{file=/h1/psfiles/figures/d98-029f6.eps,width=8.0cm}}
% \end{picture}
\caption{The reduced cross section $\sigma_{r}(x,Q^{2},y)$ measured at $\rm Q^{2}=3.5~GeV^{2}$ and different values of $x$ as a function of $y^{2}/[1+(1-y)^{2}]$ at the proton beam energies of $920$~GeV (full boxes), $575$~GeV (stars) and $460$~GeV (full circles). The inner error bars are the statistical errors and the full error bars represent the statistical and the systematic errors added in quadrature. The lines are the linear fits used to determine $F_{L}$.}
\label{fig:14} 
\end{figure}

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%15
\begin{figure}[hhh]
\center
\epsfig{file=fig_template/H1prelim-09-044.fig15.eps,width=10cm}
\setlength{\unitlength}{1cm}
% \begin{picture}(15.0,10.0)
% \put(0.,0.0)
% {\epsfig{file=/h1/psfiles/figures/d98-029f6.eps,width=8.0cm}}
% \end{picture}
\caption{The reduced cross section $\sigma_{r}(x,Q^{2},y)$ measured at $\rm Q^{2}=5~GeV^{2}$ and different values of $x$ as a function of $y^{2}/[1+(1-y)^{2}]$ at the proton beam energies of $920$~GeV (full boxes), $575$~GeV (stars) and $460$~GeV (full circles). The inner error bars are the statistical errors and the full error bars represent the statistical and the systematic errors added in quadrature. The lines are the linear fits used to determine $F_{L}$.}
\label{fig:15} 
\end{figure}

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%16
\begin{figure}[hhh]
\center
\epsfig{file=fig_template/H1prelim-09-044.fig16.eps,width=10cm}
\setlength{\unitlength}{1cm}
% \begin{picture}(15.0,10.0)
% \put(0.,0.0)
% {\epsfig{file=/h1/psfiles/figures/d98-029f6.eps,width=8.0cm}}
% \end{picture}
\caption{The longitudinal structure function $F_{L}$ measured as a function of $x$ at fixed values of $Q^{2}$. The line represents a QCD prediction of $F_{L}$ from the H1PDF 2009 fit (solid red), $F_{L}$ using $F_{2}$ from the H1PDF 2009 fit with $R=0.25$ (dashed blue) and $F_{L}$ using $F_{2}$ from the H1PDF 2009 fit with $R=0.50$ (dashed dotted magenta line).}
\label{fig:16} 
\end{figure}

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%17
\begin{figure}[hhh]
\center
\epsfig{file=fig_template/H1prelim-09-044.fig17.eps,width=10cm}
\setlength{\unitlength}{1cm}
% \begin{picture}(15.0,10.0)
% \put(0.,0.0)
% {\epsfig{file=/h1/psfiles/figures/d98-029f6.eps,width=8.0cm}}
% \end{picture}
\caption{The longitudinal structure function $F_{L}$ averaged in $x$ at given value of $Q^{2}$ for $Q^{2} < 100~GeV^{2}$ using data taken at the proton beam energies of $460$~GeV, $575$~GeV and $920$~GeV. The $x$ values of the measurements correspondig to the $Q^{2}$-value are indicated in grey. The inner error bars are the statistical errors and the full error bars represent the statistical and the systematic erros added in quadrature. The solid red line represents a QCD prediction based on H1PDF 2009 fit, the dashed magenta line is based on CTEQ $6.6$M prediction, the dashed-dotted blue line is based on Alekhin NNLO, the yellow area is based on MSTW NLO prediction and the green area is based on MSTW NNLO prediction.}
\label{fig:17} 
\end{figure}

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%18
\begin{figure}[hhh]
\center
\epsfig{file=fig_template/H1prelim-09-044.fig18.eps,width=10cm}
\setlength{\unitlength}{1cm}
% \begin{picture}(15.0,10.0)
% \put(0.,0.0)
% {\epsfig{file=/h1/psfiles/figures/d98-029f6.eps,width=8.0cm}}
% \end{picture}
\caption{The longitudinal structure function $F_{L}$ averaged in $x$ at given value of $Q^{2}$ for $Q^{2} < 1000~GeV^{2}$ using data taken at the proton beam energies of $460$~GeV, $575$~GeV and $920$~GeV. The $x$ values of the measurements corresponding to the $Q^{2}$-value are indicated in grey. The inner error bars are the statistical errors and the full error bars represent the statistical and the systematic erros added in quadrature. The solid red line represents a QCD prediction based on H1PDF 2009 fit, the dashed blue line is based on H1PDF 2009 for $F_{2}$ with $R=0.33$, the dashed-dotted blue line is based on H1PDF 2009 for $F_{2}$ with $R=0.50$ and the dotted magenta line is based on the Dipole Model (IIM).}
\label{fig:18} 
\end{figure}

\newpage
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%19
\begin{center}
\begin{figure}
%\center
\centerline{\epsfig{file=fig_template/H1prelim-09-044.fig19.eps,width=10cm}}
\setlength{\unitlength}{1cm}
% \begin{picture}(15.0,10.0)
% \put(0.,0.0)
% {\epsfig{file=/h1/psfiles/figures/d98-029f6.eps,width=8.0cm}}
% \end{picture}
\caption{The longitudinal structure function $F_{L}$ averaged in $x$ at given value of $Q^{2}$ for $Q^{2} < 100~GeV^{2}$ using data taken at the proton beam energies of $460$~GeV, $575$~GeV and $920$~GeV. The $x$ values of the measurements corresponding to the $Q^{2}$-value are indicated in grey. The inner error bars are the statistical errors and the full error bars represent the statistical and the systematic erros added in quadrature. The solid red line represents a QCD prediction based on H1PDF 2009 fit for $F_{2} $with $R=0.25$, the dashed-dotted red line is based on H1PDF 2009 for $F{2}$ with $R=0.50$, the dashed-dotted blue is based on the Dipole Model (IIM), the dotted blue line is based on the Dipole Model (GBW) and the dashed magenta line is based on WT NLO+NLL$(1/x)$ prediction.}
\label{fig:19} 
\end{figure}
\end{center}

\newpage
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%20
\begin{center}
\begin{figure}
%\center
\centerline{\epsfig{file=fig_template/H1prelim-09-044.fig20.eps,width=10cm}}
\setlength{\unitlength}{1cm}
% \begin{picture}(15.0,10.0)
% \put(0.,0.0)
% {\epsfig{file=/h1/psfiles/figures/d98-029f6.eps,width=8.0cm}}
% \end{picture}
\caption{The longitudinal structure function $F_{L}$ averaged in $x$ at given value of $Q^{2}$ for $Q^{2} < 100~GeV^{2}$ using data taken at the proton beam energies of $460$~GeV, $575$~GeV and $920$~GeV. The dashed-dotted magenta line is based on CTEQ $6.6$M prediction, the yellow area is based on MSTW NLO prediction, the green area is based on MSTW NNLO prediction, the solid red line represents a QCD prediction based on H1PDF 2009 fit for $F_{2}$ with $R=0.25$, the dashed blue is based WT NLO + NLL$(1/x)$ prediction and the dotted blue line is based on the Dipole Model (IIM).}
\label{fig:20} 
\end{figure}
\end{center}

\newpage
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%21
\begin{center}
\begin{figure}
%\center
\centerline{\epsfig{file=fig_template/H1prelim-09-044.fig21.eps,width=10cm}}
\setlength{\unitlength}{1cm}
% \begin{picture}(15.0,10.0)
% \put(0.,0.0)
% {\epsfig{file=/h1/psfiles/figures/d98-029f6.eps,width=8.0cm}}
% \end{picture}
\caption{The longitudinal structure function $F_{L}$ averaged in $x$ at given value of $Q^{2}$  in the full range of $Q^{2}$ using data taken at the proton beam energies of $460$~GeV, $575$~GeV and $920$~GeV. The $x$ values of the measurements contributing to the $Q^{2}$-value are indicated in grey. The inner error bars are the statistical errors and the full error bars represent the statistical and the systematic erros added in quadrature. The solid red line represents a QCD prediction based on H1PDF 2009 fit.}
\label{fig:21} 
\end{figure}
\end{center}

\newpage
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%22
\begin{center}
\begin{figure}
%\center
\centerline{\epsfig{file=fig_template/H1prelim-09-044.fig22.eps,width=10cm}}
\setlength{\unitlength}{1cm}
% \begin{picture}(15.0,10.0)
% \put(0.,0.0)
% {\epsfig{file=/h1/psfiles/figures/d98-029f6.eps,width=8.0cm}}
% \end{picture}
\caption{The comparation of the H1 Preliminary Results from the year 2009 represented with close circles (SpaCal), the H1 Preliminary Results from the year 2008 represented with open circles (combined SpaCal and LAr) and the H1 Published Results represented with open stars, in the range of $Q^{2} < 100~GeV^2$.}
\label{fig:22} 
\end{figure}
\end{center}

\end{document}